Multi-phase execution, risk, change orders and milestone billing — on the same contracting core Rebota built for construction.
Probability and impact live in someone's head or a stale spreadsheet, not a system anyone reviews before it becomes a delay.
Scope changes with cost/time impact get argued over months later because nothing was recorded at the point of approval.
Large, distributed projects mean billing disputes take longer to resolve without a shared record of what was actually certified.
| Business requirement | Rebota capability | Relevance | Status |
|---|---|---|---|
| Contract Management | Contracts — full lifecycle (draft → approve → active → suspend/reactivate → complete/terminate/expire/renew), amendments logged with old/new value and reason, milestones linked directly | High | Available |
| Risk Management | Risk Register | High | Available |
| Change Control | Change Orders | High | Available |
| Milestone Billing | Client Billing, Cost Control | High | Available |
| Procurement | Purchase Requisitions, RFQ, Purchase Orders | High | Available |
| HR & Payroll | HR & Payroll | Medium | Available |
Rebota is used across a wide revenue range, and the honest answer differs by band. This is what it replaces outright, what it replaces with gaps you should plan around, and where you would be better served elsewhere today.
| Annual turnover | Verdict | What that means in practice |
|---|---|---|
| ₹1 – 10 crore | Replaces | Full replacement. BOQ, measurement, RA billing with retention, procurement and labour all work on one ledger. |
| ₹10 – 100 crore | Replaces | The band this is built for. Subcontracts, subcontractor bills, bank guarantees, tender tracking and a project WBS are all live. |
| ₹100 – 500 crore | Replaces with gaps | Usable as the commercial and operational system of record, but planners will keep Primavera or MS Project — there is no critical-path scheduling here. |
| ₹500 crore and above | Not yet | Not yet. Packages this size need integrated CPM, resource levelling and multi-company consolidation, and none of the three exist. |
What is built and enforced in the product today, by jurisdiction. Anything not listed here is not claimed.
Statutory filing is India-only. For overseas EPC work you can run the project and bill in local currency, but the tax return is filed elsewhere.
| Alternative | Stay with it when | Move to Rebota when |
|---|---|---|
| SAP | You are a listed group with statutory consolidation obligations and integrated CPM is non-negotiable. | The rollout has outlasted the project it was bought for and site staff still report on WhatsApp. |
| Tally | Books only, projects tracked on paper. | You need measurement, retention and subcontractor bills connected to those books. |
| Traditional ERP | You have an internal IT function that wants to own the stack. | You want the contracting workflow working in weeks rather than configured over quarters. |
If one of these is core to how you run, Rebota is the wrong choice today and we would rather you knew now than in month three.
| Not built | Who actually needs it |
|---|---|
| Critical-path scheduling and resource levelling | Planners on large packages. Rebota tracks activities and progress; it is not a scheduling network and does not replace Primavera P6 or MS Project. |
| BIM and model-based quantity take-off | Contractors deriving quantities from a model rather than a BOQ. |
| Multi-company consolidation | Groups running many SPVs that need elimination entries and consolidated statements. |
No sign-up, no email. These run entirely in your browser.
