Real Estate Development ERP in India

What is actually different about Real Estate Development in India

Indian development has a revenue recognition problem that most software gets wrong by simplifying it. Under Ind AS 115 revenue on an under-construction sale is recognised as the obligation is satisfied, not when the booking is taken and not when the money arrives — so bookings, collections and recognised revenue are three different numbers that must reconcile, and a system holding only one of them cannot produce statutory accounts. Rebota models all three against unit inventory and construction cost. What it does not do is generate the RERA quarterly return: it holds the project, cost and collection data that return is built from, but preparing and filing it happens outside the system, and for a registered developer that is a real remaining step rather than a footnote.

Point by point

Works here today

Unit inventory with bookings and milestone collections
Ind AS 115 percentage-of-completion revenue recognition
Schedule III presentation for statutory accounts
Construction cost control against the same project
TDS under 194C on contractor payments, and 194-IA where applicable
GST on under-construction sales with e-invoicing

Does not work here

RERA quarterly return preparation and filing — data is held, the return is not produced
Consolidation across multiple project SPVs
Critical-path scheduling of the construction programme

The two halves in full

This page is the intersection. The country page covers currency, financial year and statutory position in detail; the sector page covers what is built, the turnover bands it suits, and what is missing regardless of country.

Other sectors covered for India:

Rebota for Real Estate Development in India

Can a real estate development business in India use Rebota?▾

Yes, fully — this is the market Rebota is built for, with GST compliance and e-invoicing built in.

What currency and financial year does it use?▾

INR on a 1 April – 31 March year. Both are handled properly: the fiscal calendar is resolved per company rather than hardcoded, and each invoice, bill and purchase order carries its own exchange rate rather than being converted at a single company-wide rate.

What specifically does not work?▾

RERA quarterly return preparation and filing — data is held, the return is not produced. Consolidation across multiple project SPVs. Critical-path scheduling of the construction programme. These are stated here rather than discovered later; if one of them is central to how you operate, Rebota is the wrong choice today.